Five-Year Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Bare-Metal Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND The main causes of late (>1 month) stent thrombosis (ST) are stent uncoverage, malapposition, and neoatherosclerosis. First-generation drug-eluting stents were associated with higher rate of late ST compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), especially in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) have shown similar rate of late ST than BMS. The aims of the study are to compare the ratio of uncovered to total struts per cross-section ≥30% and other optical coherence tomographic findings associated with ST between EES and BMS in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction at 5 years. METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and sixty-nine consecutive event-free patients of the randomized EXAMINATION study (A Clinical Evaluation of Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stents in the Treatment of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) were screened for optical coherence tomographic imaging at 5 years. Patients with target vessel-related events or life-threatening comorbidities were excluded. Finally, 64 patients (32 EES and 32 BMS) underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging. At 5 years, uncovered struts (4.1% versus 1.0%; P<0.01), length of uncoverage (3.4 versus 1.4 mm; P=0.02), and ratio of uncovered to total struts per cross-section ≥30% (35.5% versus 9.7%; P=0.02) were larger with EES than that with BMS. Malapposed struts (1.2% versus 0.3%; P=0.02) and malapposition length (1.3 versus 0.4 mm; P=0.06) were also larger with EES. Neoatherosclerotic plaques (16.1% versus 25.8%; P=0.35) and macrophage accumulations (19.4% versus 48.4%; P=0.02) were numerically more frequent with BMS. CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial dropout of patients, the healing pattern in event-free ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients differs between EES and BMS at 5 years. EES presented with larger amount of uncovered and malapposed struts and similar rate of neoatherosclerosis as compared with BMS. The clinical relevance of these findings warrants longer follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00828087.
منابع مشابه
Sex-related Impact on Clinical Outcome of Everolimus-eluting Versus Bare-metal Stents in ST-segment Myocardial Infarction. Insights From the EXAMINATION Trial.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The use of second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction reduces the rate of major adverse cardiac events. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sex on the performance of everolimus-eluting stents vs bare-metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at 2-year follow-up. M...
متن کاملLong-term Outcomes of Drug-eluting versus Bare-metal stent for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE To investigate long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS We performed search of MEDLINE, EMBA...
متن کاملComparison of Neointimal Tissue Characteristics Between Bare-metal and Second-generation Drug-eluting Stents Nine Months after Implantation in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Background: Neointimal tissue characteristics after implantation of stents are related to late/ very late stent thrombosis and/ or restenosis of target lesion. However, the difference of them has not been fully elucidated among bare-metal stents (BMS) and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods: The present study uses optical coherence tomography (OCT) to compare neointimal tissue ...
متن کاملPaclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, 3006 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to receive paclitaxe...
متن کاملClinical outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES The authors investigated the relative safety and efficacy of different drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using a network meta-analysis. BACKGROUND The relative safety of DES and BMS in patients with STEMI continues to be debated, and whether advances have been made in this regard with second-gen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
دوره 9 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016